Bibliographic record
Abstract
La crítica verniana ha explorado en profundidad su obra bajo el prisma de la novela de aventuras y de vulgarización científica, género en el que el autor debía moverse por razones editoriales: su contrato con Hetzel le exigía limitarse al terreno definido por las premisas programáticas de la revista Magasin d’Éducation et de Récréation. Desde esta perspectiva, lo fantástico aleja a Jules Verne de los presupuestos de su obra más divulgada. Sin embargo, resulta interesante acercarse a la producción verniana que no forma parte de los viajes extraordinarios, a ese Verne escritor de relatos cortos que se introdujo por primera vez en territorio fantástico diez años antes de firmar su contrato con Hetzel. Aunque su celebridad como novelista esconde la importancia de sus relatos cortos y cuentos, merece la pena detenerse en el análisis de Frritt-Flacc, pequeña obra maestra que nos permite estudiar el dominio que Jules Verne tenía de las técnicas del género fantástico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".