Conversational Styles of Mothers and Their Preadolescent and Middle Adolescent Daughters.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conversational styles of mothers and their preadolescent and middle adolescent daughters were examined and compared with the styles that mothers use with their friends. Middle-class Caucasian women (12 mothers of 8- to 10-year-olds; 12 mothers of 14- to 16-year-olds) participated in separate discussions with their daughters and adult friends. Rates of overlaps, simultaneous speech, and successful interruptions were coded. Mothers used different conversational styles when talking with the two partners. With friends, mothers used a high involvement style with high rates of overlaps and simultaneous speech. With daughters, mothers used a high considerateness style with low rates of overlaps and simultaneous speech, even though daughters used a high involvement style. Therefore, mothers and daughters experienced a "clash" in conversational styles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it