MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1538737853 · doi:10.1002/mren.201400060

D‐Optimality in Model‐Based Experimental Designs: Applications in NMRP of Styrene

2015· article· en· W1538737853 on OpenAlexaff
Alison J. Scott, Mark Daniel Hazlett, Eduardo Vivaldo‐Lima, Alexander Penlidis

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOptimal Experimental Design Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsPolystyreneOptimal designWork (physics)Computer scienceApplied mathematicsExperimental dataStatistical physicsBiological systemMathematicsMaterials scienceMathematical optimizationThermodynamicsPhysicsStatisticsPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model‐based D‐optimal design of experiments is applied to the nitroxide‐mediated radical polymerization (NMRP) of polystyrene. Recent studies of this system (in terms of both experimental work and model development) have led to the development of a refined (detailed) mechanistic model and a substantially reduced model. Both the fully mechanistic model and the reduced model are validated by comparing model predictions with experimental data. The D‐optimal designs (formulated using models of different complexity) are compared to each other, and contrasted with work done previously regarding the Bayesian design of experiments applied to the same system, in addition to comparisons with an anti‐correlation criterion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Reaction EngineeringSame topicOptimal Experimental Design MethodsFrench-language works237,207