MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1538737853 · doi:10.1002/mren.201400060

D‐Optimality in Model‐Based Experimental Designs: Applications in NMRP of Styrene

2015· article· en· W1538737853 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOptimal Experimental Design Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsPolystyreneOptimal designWork (physics)Computer scienceApplied mathematicsExperimental dataStatistical physicsBiological systemMathematicsMaterials scienceMathematical optimizationThermodynamicsPhysicsStatisticsPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model‐based D‐optimal design of experiments is applied to the nitroxide‐mediated radical polymerization (NMRP) of polystyrene. Recent studies of this system (in terms of both experimental work and model development) have led to the development of a refined (detailed) mechanistic model and a substantially reduced model. Both the fully mechanistic model and the reduced model are validated by comparing model predictions with experimental data. The D‐optimal designs (formulated using models of different complexity) are compared to each other, and contrasted with work done previously regarding the Bayesian design of experiments applied to the same system, in addition to comparisons with an anti‐correlation criterion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it