Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Réformeof the sixteenth century, and would tell us much about the transition from the feudal to the modern state.This raises a bigger question: must the modern state be examined through its new institutions, as Potter seems to imply, or through the message and the ideology that lay behind those institutions?The answer lies probably somewhere in the middle, as administrative history cannot be totally separated from political history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Renaissance and Reformation
- Topic
- Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
- Field
- Arts and Humanities
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- IdeologyLiteratureEmpirePoliticsNarrativeEPICContext (archaeology)PoetryHistoryTeleologyRomanceEmperorArtPhilosophyAncient historyLawArchaeologyPolitical science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes