MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1539205701 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1994.409269

A novel reduced swing CMOS bus interface circuit for high speed low power VLSI systems

2002· article· en· W1539205701 on OpenAlexaff
R. Golshan, Baher Haroun

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationSwingCMOSComputer scienceLow-power electronicsPower (physics)Interface (matter)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringPower consumptionParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major applications of CMOS VLSIs require the use of high fan out busses, such as Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) cross-bar switching matrices, high performance processors employing multiple busses, and high performance CPLDs using universal interconnection matrices. The bus interface circuits are major contributors to the power dissipation of a system for achieving high clocking frequencies. To address the increased power dissipation for high speed busses, a novel reduced voltage swing CMOS bus interface circuit is presented here. The design is a combination of drivers and receivers which perform level translation without any need to reduce the supply voltage. The simulation results based on these circuits show significant enhancements on both speed and power in comparison with the conventional CMOS tri-state driver techniques. To further assess this design, an LSI 32/spl times/32 crosspoint switch is implemented to be used for ATM communication systems. The chip uses a 1.2 /spl mu/m CMOS process with a die size of 4/spl times/3 mn, and has pseudo ECL input/output compatible interfaces which can operate at 250 Mb/s serial communication links per channel. The power consumption at 250 Mb/s is 0.6 W which is 60% lower than other published results for a similar switch. Without the input/output pad restrictions, the simulation results indicate that the switching matrix is capable of running at 622 Mb/s with a similar power reduction.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207