Business was a Family Affair: Women of Commerce in Central Europe, 1650-1880
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the mercantile activities of German women reflected a tradition dating from the high Middle Ages, the formal sanction of women’s exchange privileges was a relatively recent phenomenon. Pre-modern economic factors established the commercial agency of German businesswomen and promoted family-based enterprise in Germany’s modern economic growth. In the seventeenth century the family firm emerged as the fundamental institution of Germany’s economic elite. The interlocking interests of family patrimony and the firm’s continuity created a special niche for the business widow, legally secured by seventeenth- and eighteenth-century exchange codes. Recent social history on Germany’s nineteenth-century middle classes has begun to identify the roles of women merchants, especially in retail trade, and family-based enterprise in Germany’s modern industrial expansion. As in the pre-modern period, the women of middling family businesses played management roles and sometimes assumed control as widows. The “separate spheres” ideology, relegating women to house and home, was a prescriptive ideal with relatively little influence on the women of modest family retail and manufacturing firms. Thus the pre-modern practices of family-based enterprise shaped the legal and social structures within which women continued to exercise an important economic function into the twentieth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".