MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1540879324 · doi:10.63997/jct.v27i1.302

Using Alain Badiou's Ethic of Truths to Support an 'Eventful' Social Justice Teacher Education Program

2011· article· en· W1540879324 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum Theorizing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical theory and Gramsci
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial justiceEconomic JusticeSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPsychologyPedagogySocial psychologySocial sciencePolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the authors articulate a social justice purpose for an undergraduate teacher education program at a major Canadian university that they hope will inform more general discussions about social justice and teaching. The thesis they explore is the necessity for social justice teaching to utilize the acquisition of subject matter as a means to examine the ways in which our individual "nexus of privilege and ignorance reflect broader struggles over purposes and identities around which social practices such as education coalesce. After developing this thesis in relation to relevant literature, they turn to Henderson and Gornik's (2007) paradigmatic interpretation of "curriculum wisdom" and Badiou's (2000, 2001, 2003) ethical subjectivity of "truth-processes" to explore what the organization of curriculum in support of social justice might look like.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it