MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541941545 · doi:10.1111/dome.12053

The <scp>U</scp>nited <scp>S</scp>tates and <scp>B</scp>ahrain: Interpreting the Differentiated <scp>U</scp>.<scp>S</scp>. Responses to the <scp>A</scp>rab <scp>S</scp>pring

2014· article· en· W1541941545 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigest of Middle East Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Conflict and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceIncentiveAdministration (probate law)Spring (device)HumanitiesPoliticsEconomicsArtPhilosophyLawEngineeringLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We examine how the U nited S tates' response to the situation in B ahrain can be differentiated from that in L ibya and E gypt based on a comparative content analysis of the U . S . administration's press releases, remarks, and interviews during the first three months of the A rab S pring movement. Our findings indicate that although the level and duration of violence were comparable, the U . S . government response was strikingly different with the support given to the B ahraini government, in contrast to the critical stances adopted towards L ibya and E gypt. We explain how the U nited S tates' lack of political incentive to act and concerted support by its allies were influential factors for the U nited S tates' differentiated policy during the A rab S pring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.235
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.235
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it