A framework for scheduling DRAM memory accesses for multi-core mixed-time critical systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mixed-time critical systems are real-time systems that accommodate both hard real-time (HRT) and soft realtime (SRT) tasks. HRT tasks mandate a gurantee on the worstcase latency, while SRT tasks have average-case bandwidth (BW) demands. Memory requests in mixed-time critical systems usually have different transaction sizes based on whether the issuer task is HRT or SRT. For example, HRT tasks often issue requests with a cache line size. On the other side, SRT tasks may issue requests with a size of KBs. Requests from multimedia cores, cores controlling network interfaces and direct memory accesses (DMAs) are obvious examples of these large-size requests. Based on these observations, we promote in this work a new approach to schedule memory requests. This approach retains locality within large-size requests to minimize the worst-case latency, while maintaining the average-case BW as high as required. To achieve this target, we introduce a novel and compact time-division-multiplexing scheduler that is adequate for mixed-time critical systems. We also present a novel framework that constructs optimal offchip DRAM memory controller schedules for multi-core mixedtime critical systems. These schedules are loaded to the memory controller during boot-time. Based on the proposed schedule, we provide a detailed static analysis that guarantees predictability. We compare the proposed controller against state-of-the-art realtime memory controllers using synthetic experiments as well as a practical use-case from multimedia systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".