Safe Spaces: Gay-Straight Alliances in High Schools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Philip Roth's Humbling dramatizes the insecurities, eccentricities, and suicide of Simon Axler, an actor who loses his ability to experience and project the magic of classical stage performance. (1) After near-mental collapse, followed by rehabilitation in psychiatric hospital, Axler becomes the lover of the sexually adventuresome Pegeen Mike Stapleford, named after Pegeen Mike Flaherty, the female lead and barmaid in Synge's Playboy of the Western World. Roth's Pegeen is the daughter of Axler's longtime friends Asa and Carol Stapleford. At age forty, she is yet twenty-five years younger than Axler. Pegeen has become sexually involved with Axler after two recent relationships--one with Priscilla, lesbian who eventually becomes male (51), the other with Louise Renner, dean of nearby Prescott College, a small, progressive women's college (48), where Pegeen teaches environmental science. After hiring Pegeen for sexual gratification (52), Renner bemoans having been abandoned by conniving opportunist (56). When Pegeen similarly conquers and abandons Axler, he becomes psychologically debilitated but resolves to stage grand comeback, suicide modeled on that of the failed writer and romantic Konstantin Treplev in Chekhov's Seagull. Although Axler carefully scripts his own exit with shot to the head, his death is less tragic than pathetic, staged production in which he is both actor and audience. Self-conscious to the end--and in chapter aptly titled The Last Act (91)--he fails to grasp that the performer of high drama, should not act; he should, rather, impulsively and instinctively become the part. (2) Otherwise stated--and with reference to Axler's theatrical flops as Prospero and Macbeth (4)--the part cannot become the person when the person breaks the spell by becoming his own spectator and critic. Not that one would sanction suicide for the greater polish of its execution, but such are the cognitive, theatrical, and narrative concerns of Humbling. Yet the novel, in its excursion into comparative drama, accomplishes significantly more, and mainly because of its silent debt to dramatis personae, cognitive phenomena, and anthropological rituals inspired by the writings of George S. Kaufman, Edna Ferber, and Arthur Koestler. When viewed, moreover, through Koestler's theory of bisociative thinking--a term Koestler uses to explore surprising points of consistency among disparate subject matter and seemingly unrelated fields of consciousness--Axler is not the failed Shakespearean performer he fancies himself. Roth mentions neither Koestler nor the team of Kaufman and Ferber in Humbling or in several interviews about the novel. But Roth is not obliged to reveal either the association of ideas or the history of reading that may have helped to inspire and advance highly dramatic narrative that draws upon, while modernizing, possible sources through provocative metamorphoses. (3) With regard to those external, unacknowledged contexts of artistic inspiration, Axler is imbued with features of Roth's reading while necessarily remaining unaware of creative debt that allies Humbling, in unique ways, with Roth's later-life narratives about aging and death, including Dying Animal, Everyman, and Exit Ghost. In Humbling, Axler is nonetheless personally versed in any number of dramatic works, among which are Oedipus the King, Antigone, Death of Salesman, Iceman Cometh, Hamlet, Othello, and King Lear. (4) O'Neill's A Long Day's Journey into Night is also reference point for Axler, who at times fancies himself playing James Tyrone, Sr., an actor who has botched his domestic life and squandered his creative powers after career of limited, though lucrative, stage roles. These literary points of reference significantly shape both the reader's sense of Simon Axler and Axler's perception of himself as performing artist, allowing us to group Humbling among such works as Roth's 'An Actor's Life for Me, Human Stain (where the aptly named Coleman Silk acts the part of Jew and Caucasian), Operation Shylock (in which the false Philip Roth plays his part with such conviction and bravado), and Sabbath's Theater (with Sabbath persistently staging transgressive expressions of the self in sexually repressive society). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it