MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545341018 · doi:10.1515/9781474443517

Sir Andrew Wylie of that Ilk

2024· book· en· W1545341018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Galt

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John Galt (1779-1839) was among the most popular and prolific Scottish writers of the nineteenth century. He wrote in a panoply of forms and genres about a great variety of topics and settings, drawing on his experiences of living, working, and travelling in Scotland and England, in Europe and the Mediterranean, and in North America. While he is best known for his humorous tales and serious sagas about Scottish life, his fiction spans many other genres including historical novels, gothic tales, political satire, travel narratives, and short stories. The Edinburgh Edition of the Works of John Galt is the first-ever scholarly edition of Galt’s fiction; it presents a wide range of Galt’s works, some of which have never been reprinted. The series contains authoritative texts together with materials that add to an appreciation of Galt’s historical context, his cultural heritage, and his overall importance within literary history. Editorial Board Series Editor - Angela Esterhammer, University of Toronto Gerard Carruthers, University of GlasgowIan Duncan, University of California, BerkeleyPenny Fielding, University of EdinburghSuzanne Gilbert, University of StirlingRegina Hewitt, University of South FloridaAlison Lumsden, University of AberdeenKatie Trumpener, Yale University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207