MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545419605

An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of A Diversity Educational Program

2010· article· en· W1545419605 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)CurriculumCultural diversitySociologyPopulationDiversity trainingPublic relationsInterpretation (philosophy)PedagogyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A DIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM by SONYA A. BERKLEY May 2010 Advisor: Mary Cay Sengstock Major: Sociology Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Administrators and educators have been given the responsibility of working towards improving racial and social interactions in their school settings. It is important to note that most of the literature on diversity programming suggests that the perception held by a school's administration of what constitutes an all encompassing racially and culturally diverse program plays an important role in its implementation and success. With the continual growth of minority populations in the United States, studies argue that schools should strive to be as diverse as the communities they serve. Some communities have altered their school curricula and introduced diversity training to their staff and students to make their programs more reflective of the school's population. However, data suggests critical reforms are still needed nationwide to increase awareness and tolerance of racial and cultural differences in educational institutions (Fereshten, 1995, Pyszkowski, 1993, Wang et al., 1995). This study explores the link between how school administrators and educators construct their definition of diversity and whether their perceptions are an important factor in the success of the program. According to the educators and administrators who participated in the study, many believed existing problems in the classroom stemmed from students' lack of interest and peer distraction. In order to gain a better understanding of why certain behaviors and lack of motivation exist in their classrooms, student narratives were incorporated to further enhance the study. Student narratives (text told in the students own words) have been incorporated and may allow insight into the evaluation of the diversity program from their perspectives. Mcgill (2003) believed understanding and addressing students' perceptions is one of the most positive ways to inform educators of what their students are thinking. Students' experiences have been captured and analyzed. The narratives may offer alternative reasons for negative classroom behaviors and interactions, as well as disclose positive social interactions. In addition to the interpretation factor, an examination of prior literature reveals that the methodological approach before the early 1990s tends to be more quantitative than qualitative. The first phase (1999-2000 school terms) consisted of participant observations in nine of the educators' classrooms and face-to-face interviews with those teachers and the school's administrator. The second phase (2000-2001) consisted of interviews from thirty-four students and utilized the jointly told tales approach. This approach allowed students to give their perceptions of the Edison diversity program implemented in their own words, which was incorporated into the body of the report without modifications. Phase three, the last phase, occurred during the 2003-2004 school terms and involved revisiting the diversity program carried out at the Mount Clemens High School after the Edison Program was phased out. The Edison students and educators were merged into the traditional public school setting. Several of the educators who participated in phase one of the study were also respondents of the looking back segment (phase three) of the study, and addressed the likenesses and differences they observed between the diversity programming of the 1999-2000 school terms versus the 2003-2004 school terms. In addition, seven new educators and one administrator participated in the third phase of the study, which revisited face-to-face interviews and classroom observations. The field study follows the qualitative approach that allows for rich, thick descriptions and interpretations. "Rich descriptions convey the experiences of someone who was there by developing concepts and tentative hypotheses in order to make sense of the data" (Singleton and Straits, 1999: 354). My role in the field, engaging in participant observations and conducting interviews with administrators and educators, impacts the reflexive analysis of the data collection, and the content analysis. With this new information, educational programs can be designed that will promote positive racial and cultural interactions and acceptance. All schools should make efforts to teach these social skills to help individuals develop a greater understanding and respect of others' differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it