Self Esteem Theory and Measurement: A Critical Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently in North America, the self-esteem of children of immigrants and of adolescents from other cultures has been measured and compared with American-born adolescents using a scale developed over three decades ago in the United States. This study seeks to critically examine the theoretical assumptions behind this measure of self-esteem and the scale commonly used to measure the concept of self-esteem in order to discern whether they can apply adequately to adolescents of both genders and to adolescents from diverse cultural backgrounds. In this paper, I first give an historical overview of the concepts of self, self-esteem, and adolescence. Then, I critically analyze theoretical assumptions and methodological applications of the notion and measurement of self-esteem as utilized in the United States. Finally, I conclude that the existing assumptions about the concept of self-esteem reflect and are biased toward Western ideas of the self that are not inclusive of diverse cultural norms. My paper suggests that we refine our current universalistic notion of self-esteem to incorporate cultural diversity and gender socialization. This critical discussion is essential in an increasingly multicultural North American setting in which many currently held assumptions need to be challenged and revised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it