MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553492702 · doi:10.1300/j477v01n02_07

The Importance of Biodiversity in Crop Sustainability: A Look at Monoculture

2007· article· en· W1553492702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonocultureBiodiversitySustainabilityAgricultural biodiversityAgricultureNatural resource economicsFood securityEcosystemSelection (genetic algorithm)AgroforestrySustainable agricultureCropGlobal biodiversityBusinessFlora (microbiology)Environmental resource managementEcologyBiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Biodiversity is used to refer to the collective of ecosystems, species, and genes which together comprise earth. Genetic variability between, among, and within species is often favored and is regarded as a major determinant of which particular species and/or ecosystems will survive. Globally, consumer demands and agricultural practices have led to a “selection” and/or exploitation of a select few species of flora. This article discusses monoculture as a form of crop cultivation and introduces reasons why it poses a clear and present threat to biodiversity, sustainable agriculture, and food security. Moreover, time tested, economically feasible agricultural alternatives are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it