"Our Own Identity, Our Own Taonga, Our Own Self Coming Back": Indigenous Voices in New Zealand Record-Keeping
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le point de vue des peuples indignes prsente des dfis importants pour les archivistes dans plusieurs parties du monde.En Nouvelle-Zlande, comme au Canada, les peuples indignes ont utilis l'information contenue dans les documents d'archives afin de raffirmer leurs droits et de reconqurir leur pass.Cet article prsente une tude de cas des droits et des intrts pour les archives des Maoris, peuple indigne de la Nouvelle-Zlande.Les perspectives des Maoris sur les archives sont examines travers des comptes rendus de premire main et des analyses des archives, des muses et des bibliothques de Nouvelle-Zlande dans leur dveloppement vers l'implantation d'une forme de biculturalisme .L'auteur fait valoir que l'impact des Maoris sur la gestion des documents se retrouve l'intrieur d'un spectre qui va de leur reconnexion avec l'information culturelle contenue dans les documents crits jusqu' la demande d'un contrle sur la gestion des ressources, en passant par l'exigence d'un rapatriement des documents leur propritaires culturels.ABSTRACT Indigenous people's perspectives present strong challenges to records keepers in many parts of the world.In New Zealand, as in Canada, indigenous people have used the information held in archives to reassert their rights and reclaim the past.This article provides a case study of the rights and interests of New Zealand's indigenous people, the Maori, in archives.Maori perspectives on archives are explored through firsthand accounts and analysis of developments in New Zealand archives, museum, and library environments towards the implementation of "biculturalism."It is argued that the Maori impact on record-keeping falls along a spectrum from reconnecting Maori with * This is an expanded and updated version of a paper originally presented to Beyond the Screen: Capturing Corporate and Social Memory, Australian Society of Archivists Conference, Melbourne, August 2000.My deep thanks to: Rachel Lilburn, Victoria University, and Sandra Falconer, Archives New Zealand, for assisting me in locating resources; to Archives New Zealand's Sub Committee for Responsiveness to Maori and Te
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it