MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555391053 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v17i1.1871

La double dimension de l'apprentissage autodirigé Contribution à une théorie du sujet social apprenant

2003· article· fr· W1555391053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article the author lays the foundation for a conceptualization of self-direction from an analysis of its place in the debates occurring in both Europe and North America. The proposed model is grounded in two meanings of the concept: the self-determined will to learn and the abilities of learning self-regulation. Self-efficacy to learn underlies these two meanings in the proposed conceptualization of self-direction. Résumé Cet article jette les bases d'une conceptualisation de l'autodirection à partir du débat sur cette notion en Amérique du Nord et en Europe. Le modèle théorique proposé est enracine dans deux dimensions conceptuelles : la volonté autodéterminée d'apprendre d'un côté et les capacités d'autorégulation de l'apprentissage de l'autre. Le sentiment d'efficacité personnelle à apprendre est sous-jacent à ces deux dimensions dans le modèle proposé de l'autodirection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it