Developing countries given easier access to biomedical journals
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Journalistic news item on biomedical journal access for developing countries and on disputes over CMAJ editorial decisions; news about scholarly publishing and journal editorial independence, mapped but not pooled.
This appears to be a news item about access to biomedical journals, making it contextual scholarly-communication material rather than analytic research.
News-style item on biomedical journal access and CMAJ editorial controversy maps scholarly communication but is not analytic metaresearch.
Abstract
Some doctors disagree with CMAJ editorial decisions, and they used last month's CMA annual meeting in Quebec City to let the editor know. When British Columbia GP John O'Brien-Bell, a CMA past president, questioned the decision to publish a particular article on hospital downsizing ([www.cma.ca/cmaj
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central)
- Topic
- Global Health and Surgery
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- PublicationLibrary scienceOperations researchMedicineComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawEngineering
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes