MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1559628309 · doi:10.4000/gss.1428

L’arrivée de la libération gay en France. Le Front Homosexuel d’Action Révolutionnaire (FHAR)

2010· article· fr· W1559628309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenre sexualité & société · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Front homosexuel d’action révolutionnaire (FHAR), fondé à Paris en mars 1971 par un noyau de lesbiennes et d’homosexuels masculins, marqua une nouvelle direction pour le militantisme homosexuel en France, en rompant avec la discrétion et la respectabilité prônées par Arcadie, le mouvement « homophile » créé par André Baudry en 1954. Les nouveaux militants homosexuels qui adhéraient au FHAR puisaient leur rhétorique révolutionnaire chez les gauchistes de Mai 68 ; ils dénonçaient « la sexualité dominante, hétérosexuelle et capitaliste » et menaient des actions délibérément provocatrices. Les réunions hebdomadaires à l’École des Beaux Arts à Paris, qui continuèrent malgré tout pendant trois ans, devinrent un « bordel » chaotique, voire une orgie gigantesque, et les lesbiennes les abandonnèrent. Le FHAR se montrait incapable de lutter efficacement pour les droits des homosexuels et il disparut en février 1974. Les associations gays qui lui succédaient dans les années 1970-1980 revendiquaient une démarche plus pragmatique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it