MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1559820134 · doi:10.1109/iswcs.2005.1547647

Joint Estimation of Channel Parameters for MIMO Communication Systems

2005· article· en· W1559820134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOMultipath propagationComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Joint (building)Subspace topologyCommunications systemMulti-user MIMODelay spreadElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the next generation mobile communication systems, high data rates and high capacity are expected if multiple antennas are used at both receive and transmit sides. Such a radio propagation channel constitutes a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system. In a wireless MIMO system, it is possible to estimate channel parameters in a multipath environment by extending the classical parameter estimation methods to the joint space and time domain. In this paper, we propose a subspace-based approach to jointly estimate the angle-of-arrival (AOA), angle-of-departure (AOD) and delay-of-arrival (DOA) of digitally modulated multipath signals in MIMO communication systems. The novel approach uses a collection of estimates of a space-time manifold vector of the channel which utilizes a Khatri-Rao product to transfer the estimated channel response matrix to the classical model. Simulation results show that the proposed methods can achieve high resolution of channel parameters and resolve more multipath components than the number of array elements

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it