Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) is a representative forum for regulators of securities and futures markets. Founded in 1983, it is headquartered in Madrid, Spain. IOSCO's voting membership includes the chief regulatory authorities for the world's financial jurisdictions. These are mainly but not solely national – certain members represent transnational (e.g., the West African Monetary Union acts for eight countries) and sub‐national markets (e.g., Ontario and Québec have separate delegates). The organization's voting membership totalled 114 in 2010, with oversight of more than 95 percent of global securities markets. IOSCO forms part of a developing architecture of global governance through international networks. It is significant as an agency whose goals are both to promote global exchange and to regulate the terms of such exchange, implying a model of economic globalization based on increasing standardization across national borders and legal systems. IOSCO is especially interesting in aiming to steer activities in financial markets, one of the primary challenges for global economic coordination. The organization's work has become highly relevant in light of successive shocks to the global financial system: notably the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the global financial crisis of 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.099 | 0.075 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".