MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561168721

The State Route 520 Floating Bridge in Seattle, Washington

2013· article· en· W1561168721 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)TowerMetropolitan areaFloat (project management)Forensic engineeringEngineeringGeographyArchaeologyCivil engineeringMarine engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The four longest floating bridges in the world are located in Seattle, Washington on the North West Coast of the United States of America. At 2.3 km long and 35 m wide, the Evergreen Point Floating Bridge, also known as the State Route (SR) 520 Bridge, is the longest floating bridge in the world. Home to around 3.5 million people, the metropolitan area of Seattle is divided by Lake Washington and the SR 520 transports 115,000 vehicles across Lake Washington on a daily basis. At depths reaching 61 m [1] a suspension bridge would require a bridge tower of over 183 m; thus a floating bridge is necessary. Constructed in 1963, this bridge however is now approaching the end of its lifespan and will be replaced by an even longer and wider floating bridge by 2014. This paper will investigate why the bridge must be replaced, the past and current reasons for selecting a floating bridge to cross Lake Washington, what it takes to make a concrete bridge float, and how the new bridge will vary from the existing bridge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it