MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561881745 · doi:10.1159/000071373

Therapeutic Potential of Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in the Management of Tumor Angiogenesis

2003· review· en· W1561881745 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in experimental tumor research · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiogenesisPharmacologyCancer researchIn vivoMedicineProtein kinase BCyclooxygenaseChemotherapyChemistryImmunologyBiologyInternal medicineSignal transductionEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is clear that COX-2 plays an important role in tumor and endothelial cell biology. Increased expression of COX-2 occurs in multiple cells within the tumor microenvironment that can impact on angiogenesis. COX-2 appears to: (a) play a key role in the release and activity of proangiogenic proteins; (b) result in the production of eicosanoid products TXA2, PGI2, PGE2 that directly stimulate endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis in vivo, and (c) result in enhanced tumor cell, and possibly, vascular endothelial cell survival by upregulation of the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and/or activation of PI3K-Akt. Selective pharmacologic inhibition of COX-2 represents a viable therapeutic option for the treatment of malignancies. Agents that selectively inhibit COX-2 appear to be safe, and well tolerated suggesting that chronic treatment for angiogenesis inhibition is feasible [107-110]. Because these agents inhibit angiogenesis, they should have at least additive benefit in combination with standard chemotherapy [111] and radiation therapy [24, 112]. In preclinical models, a selective inhibitor of COX-2 was shown to potentiate the beneficial antitumor effects of ionizing radiation with no increase in normal tissue cytotoxicity [113-115]. More recently, metronomic dosing regimens of standard chemotherapeutic agents without extended rest periods were shown to target the microvasculature in experimental animal models and result in significant antitumor activity [116-118]. This antiangiogenic chemotherapy regimen could be enhanced by the concurrent administration of an angiogenesis inhibitor [116-119]. Trials that will evaluate continuous low dose cyclophosphamide in combination with celecoxib are underway in patients with metastatic renal cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [120]. Given the safety and tolerability of the selective COX-2 inhibitors, and the potent antiangiogenic properties of these agents, the combination of antiangiogenic chemotherapy with a COX-2 inhibitor warrants clinical evaluation [118, 121, 122]. The effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors on angiogenesis may also be due, in part, to COX-independent mechanisms [123-125]. Several reports have confirmed COX-independent effects of celecoxib, at relatively high concentrations (50 microM), where apoptosis is stimulated in cells that lack both COX-1 and COX-2 [126]. More recently, Song et al. [127] described structural modifications to celecoxib that revealed no association between the COX-2 inhibitory and proapoptotic activities of celecoxib [125]. Some of the COX-independent mechanisms for NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors include activation of protein kinase G, inhibition of NF-kappa B activation, downregulation of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-XL, inhibition of PPAR delta, and activation of PPAR gamma. One or more of these COX-independent effects could contribute to the antiangiogenic properties of NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors. In order to take advantage of both the COX-dependent and COX-independent benefits of NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors, will require evaluation of these agents in neoplastic disease settings, using cancer-specific biomarkers. In conclusion, the contribution of COX-2 at multiple points in the angiogenic cascade makes it an ideal target for pharmacologic inhibition. The reported success of selective COX-2 inhibitors in cancer prevention could be related to angiogenesis inhibition [109]. As premalignant lesions progress towards malignancy, there is a switch to the angiogenic phenotype that is subsequently followed by rapid tumor growth [128, 129]. Intervention with angiogenesis inhibitors at this early stage of carcinogenesis has been shown to attenuate tumor growth in transgenic mouse models [130, 131]. The continued dependence on angiogenesis for later stages of tumorigenesis suggests that COX-2 inhibitors also will have clinical utility in the management of advanced cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it