MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562153945

"The Dresden Story": Racism, Human Rights, and the Jewish Labour Committee of Canada

2001· article· en· W1562153945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCamosun College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismPolitical scienceHumanitiesJudaismEthnologyLegislationHuman rightsSociologyLawArtHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article uses a case study to explore how organized labour, particularly the Jewish Labour Committee, contributed to the development of human rights values and anti-discrimination law in the immediate post-war period. The study focuses on the town of Dresden, Ontario, which at one time was infamous for its treatment of blacks. When a number of organizations (including labour groups) lobbied the Ontario government to create Canada's first Fair Accommodation Practices Act, they pointed to Dresden as an example of why this legislation was necessary. After the legislation was passed, they used litigation to ensure that discrimination in Dresden would come to an end. The paper demonstrates that, although the trade union movement in Canada was not free from racism, it nevertheless played an important and under-appreciated role in fighting for egalitarian human rights. Resume Cet article utilise une etude de cas pour explorer comment la main-d'oeuvre organisee, en particulier le comite de la main-d'oeuvre juive, a contribue a mettre en valeur les droits de la personne et les lois contre la discrimination raciale dans les annees d'apres-guerre. L'etude se concentre sur la ville de Dresden, Ontario, qui etait reputee a l'epoque pour la facon dont ses habitants traitaient les Noirs. Lorsque plusieurs organismes (y compris des groupes travaillistes) ont fait des pressions sur le gouvernement de l'Ontario pour qu'il adopte la premiere loi des pratiques d'equite au Canada, ils ont cite l'exemple de Dresden pour expliquer pourquoi cette loi etait necessaire. Apres l'adoption de la loi, ces organismes ont meme intente un proces pour s'assurer que la discrimination raciale a Dresden prenne fin. Selon l'article, bien que le mouvement syndical au Canada ne soit pas exempt de racisme, il a neanmoins joue un role important, mais peu apprecie, dans la bataille pour les droits a l'egalite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it