Obsessive—Compulsive Disorder and Psychosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the phenomenology, treatment, course, and outcome of patients with comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and psychotic features. METHOD: A retrospective chart analysis was conducted on 15 patients with OCD with psychotic features. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, psychiatric diagnosis, duration of illness, treatment details, and clinically determined outcome over time. RESULTS: Obsessive doubts, washing, and checking compulsions were the most commonly seen obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms. Of the patients, 53% had first-rank symptoms, and 77% showed significant improvement on treatment with a combination of antipsychotic and antiobsessional drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The observed improvement on treatment with a combination of antiobsessional and antipsychotic drugs supports the use of combination treatment in patients who have both OC and psychotic symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it