MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Indium and Indium Compounds

2010· other· en· W1566967151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndiumIndium tin oxideSmeltingMaterials scienceMetallurgyMetalZincEnvironmental scienceNanotechnologyThin film

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Indium is a very soft, silvery metal and its abundance is about 0.05 ppm in the earth's crust. It is widely distributed, but never in concentrations high enough to justify mining for its own intrinsic value. Indium is considered a minor metal and is a by‐product of other mining and refining operations. Important mines producing indium are in South America, Canada, China, and the Republic of Korea. Indium is recovered from fumes, dusts, slags, residues, and alloys from zinc or lead‐zinc smelting. Indium metal itself poses little or no environmental risks, however sometimes the form that indium takes or other metal associated with it may pose dangers to the environment. A large portion of secondary indium is produced from indium tin oxide (ITO) recycling. Indium's major use is in the production of ITO. ITO thin film coatings are primarily used for electrically conductive purposes in a variety of flat‐panel devices. Other uses include solders and alloys, electrical components, and semiconductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it