MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567138959 · doi:10.1177/117718011200800407

Miskitu Women and their Social Contribution to the Regional Politics of the Atlantic Coast of Nicaragua

2012· article· en· W1567138959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Central America
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsInstitutionalisationAutonomyIndigenousAgency (philosophy)Political scienceNarrativePeacemakingGender studiesPolitical economySociologyPublic administrationLawSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article addresses elements that are central for building a genealogy of contemporary Miskitu indigenous women's participation in various realms, such as the Contra War, the peacemaking process, the popular consultation for Law 28, and the process of autonomy. This narrative brings to the forefront Miskitu women in a continuum of political settings and agendas that inform their agency during a time period that has two political poles: the armed conflict of the 1980s and the slow achievement of autonomy. This article conveys the message that Miskitu women's social and political activism has been central to regional politics, though the institutionalization of autonomy has advanced without properly including indigenous women as political representatives and/or citizens that are in need of special protection against systemic violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it