MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1568080758 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.105905.v1

Statistical Modelling and Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete

2013· article· en· W1568080758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressive strengthMetakaolinSuperplasticizerSilica fumeAggregate (composite)Materials scienceCementComposite materialMatrix (chemical analysis)Geotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The matrix mixture of concrete can be made to have high compressive strength. In the present paper, statistical model was built-up to predict the compressive strength of concrete containing different matrix mixtures at fixed age or at different age of 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, 90 and 180 days. The model examines eight different parameters for the matrix mixture that includes: time, water, cement, metakaolin (MK), silica fume (SF), sand (S), aggregate (A) and superplasticizer (SP). This research addresses the effect of the matrix mixture of concrete on the compressive strength, where this information will help the cement industry in producing the required concrete strength. The results from the predicted model have high correlation to the experimental results for the concrete compressive strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it