MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1570326739 · doi:10.20381/ruor-13060

Knowledge discovery for behavioral patterns in wireless sensor networks

2008· dissertation· en· W1570326739 on OpenAlexaff
Samer Samarah

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkBehavioral patternProcess (computing)Computer scienceWirelessKnowledge extractionSet (abstract data type)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksData miningEngineeringWireless networkDistributed computingComputer networkTelecommunicationsSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research consolidated in this thesis is motivated by the recent evolvement of wireless technologies and microelectronic devices, which instigated the emergence of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Many WSN-based applications have come about; these applications are related, but not limited, to the fields of military, environment and health care. Research in WSNs is still in its early stages, and efforts have been put forward to design fast, reliable, and fault-tolerant protocols that guarantee acceptable levels of quality for events delivery, to meet the limited capabilities of sensor nodes and the effects of unreliable wireless communication. In this thesis, we focus on the design of a Knowledge-based framework for extracting behavioral patterns regarding sensor nodes from WSNs. Three types of behavioral patterns are introduced: Sensor Association Rules, Coverage-based Rules and Sensor Chronological Patterns. The proper steps in the Knowledge Discovery process that pertain to the extraction of the behavioral patterns are defined. These steps are: (i) a formal definition of the required 'knowledge'; (ii) the data preparation stage that covers the communication aspects of the process of preparing data that is needed to extract these patterns; (iii) the data mining techniques that are essential for extracting the required patterns. A set of schemes have been proposed to attain these steps, and meet the critical properties of WSNs. In contrast to other techniques, the proposed behavioral patterns are mainly about the sensor nodes, instead of the area under monitoring. The direct application of the proposed patterns is enhancing the performance of WSNs by participating in the resource management process of sensor nodes, and reducing the undesired cons of wireless communication; thus improving the Quality of Service of WSNs. Several experiments have been conducted, using synthetic and real data, to report about the performance of proposed schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207