MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571292285 · doi:10.7202/600632ar

La première génération de Saguenayens : provenance, apparentement, enracinement

2008· article· fr· W1571292285 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Raymond C. Roy, Gérard Bouchard, Manon Declos

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsStatistics CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvenanceGeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La population du Saguenay se caractérise par une forte prévalence ou incidence de quelques maladies génétiques rares ou inexistantes ailleurs. Traditionnellement, ce phénomène a été imputé au fait que cette population régionale se serait développée en vase clos, après la mise en place d’une poignée de familles fondatrices aux environs de 1840. Les reconstitutions auxquelles se sont livrés les auteurs ne corroborent pas cette représentation. Entre 1838 et 1911, la région a accueilli plus de 28 000 immigrants, soit un rapport moyen d’un immigrant pour trois naissances. Toute explication de l’homogénéité (relative au demeurant) du bassin génétique saguenayen doit donc tenir compte du nombre élevé des entrées sur une longue période, surtout lorsqu’on considère que ces immigrants provenaient très majoritairement d’une seule région et étaient regroupés en familles, elles-mêmes très apparentées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207