MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576523742 · doi:10.1109/ihtc.2015.7238043

Using the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) technique for heart disease diagnosis

2015· article· en· W1576523742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtreme learning machineHeart diseaseComputer scienceMachine learningDiseaseArtificial intelligenceBlood sugarDiabetes mellitusMedical emergencyMedicineArtificial neural networkInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most important applications of machine learning systems is the diagnosis of heart disease which affect the lives of millions of people. Patients suffering from heart disease have lot of independent factors such as age, sex, serum cholesterol, blood sugar, etc. in common which can be used very effectively for diagnosis. In this paper an Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) algorithm is used to model these factors. The proposed system can replace a costly medical checkups with a warning system for patients of the probable presence of heart disease. The system is implemented on real data collected by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation where around 300 patients information has been collected. Simulation results show this architecture has about 80% accuracy in determining heart disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207