MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577633455 · doi:10.1002/9781118742655.ch5

<i>IN‐SITU</i>MICROWAVE‐ASSISTED FABRICATION OF POLYMERIC NANOCOMPOSITES

2013· other· en· W1577633455 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid SadAbadi, Simona Bǎdilescu, Muthukumaran Packirisamy, Rolf Wüthrich

Bibliographic record

VenueNanocomposites · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanocompositeColloidal goldMicrowaveNanoparticleAnnealing (glass)FabricationPolymerNanotechnologyIn situIrradiationChemical engineeringNanometreMicrowave irradiationComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gold – poly(dimethylsiloxane) (Au–PDMS) nanocomposites are synthesized in the form of gels, foams, and films. In this chapter, the authors report their results on a novel in situ synthesis of Au–PDMS by using a microwave-induced reduction of gold ions. Microwave heating has been studied as a promising technique for nanoparticle synthesis. Microwave irradiation has been used for the preparation of gold and silver nanoparticles under various conditions. The authors investigate the microwave-induced reduction of gold ions onto a PDMS matrix and the usefulness of the nanocomposite for sensing application. During the interaction between PDMS and the solution, sub-nanometer- sized gold seeds are formed on the surface, which possibly initiate the formation of gold nanoparticles during the irradiation. The gold nanoparticles prepared by microwave irradiation are distributed in the polymer matrix, and to increase the density of nanoparticles on the surface, an annealing process is employed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanocompositesSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207