Magnetization Characterization of Superconductors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The superconducting state occurs for many elements, alloys, and compounds when cooled to sufficiently low temperatures, specifically, below the critical temperature, T c . The initial discoveries by Onnes in 1911 and 1914 were of the loss of electrical resistance at very low temperatures and of its reestablishment by applying a strong enough magnetic field or a high enough current. A further discovery by Meissner and Ochsenfeld in 1933 was that a magnetic field could be expelled from a superconducting material as it was cooled through its T c . This perfect diamagnetic behavior coupled with perfect conductivity led to the derivation of London equations describing the superconducting state in 1935. At present, there are many known superconducting materials ranging from pure elements such as lead, that are superconducting at liquid helium temperatures, to complex ceramics such as YBaCuO 7‐x operating at liquid nitrogen temperatures. Also, uses of superconductors vary enormously ranging from sensitive magnetic field detectors to electric power cables. Certain engineered superconducting materials and composites can carry very high transport currents in high magnetic fields and much research at this time is being devoted to the development of commercial and also power utility applications. The characterization of these technological materials is a very important part of these activities. Here, we present some basic features of magnetization characterization of superconductors, in particular high temperature superconductors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it