Quarter-Sweep Improving Modified Gauss-Seidel Method for Pricing European Option
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the application of the Quarter-Sweep Improving Modified Gauss-Seidel (QSIMGS) method in evaluating European option which governed by Black-Scholes partial differential equation (PDE). Quarter-sweep Crank-Nicolson approach is applied to approximate the PDE. Then, the generated linear system is solved by using the IMGS method. Some numerical experiments for a family of Gauss-Seidel (GS) methods such as Gauss-Seidel, Modified Gauss-Seidel (MGS) and Improving Modified Gauss-Seidel (IMGS) methods are performed with each full-, half-, and quarter-sweep iterations. Thus, from the numerical results obtained, we can show that the QSIMGS method is the most effective method. Keywords: Quarter-Sweep Improving Modified Gauss-Seidel method; Black-Scholes PDE; Crank-Nicolson scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".