MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580337135

Review: Remedies for a New West: Healing Landscapes, Histories and Cultures - eScholarship

2010· article· en· W1580337135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierMythologyScholarshipNarrativeEnvironmental ethicsHistorySociologyAnthropologyArchaeologyLawClassicsArtPolitical scienceLiteraturePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: Remedies for a New West: Healing Landscapes, Histories and Cultures Patricia Nelson Limerick, Andrew Cowell, and Sharon K. Collinge (Eds). Reviewed by Enzo Ferrara Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy Limerick, Patricia Nelson, Cowell, Andrew, and Collinge, Sharon K. (Eds.). Remedies for a New West: Healing Landscapes, Histories and Cultures. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 2009. x + 324 pp. ISBN 9780816525997. US$35.00. Acid-free paper. The eleven essays composing this valuable collection originated after a lecture series, “Healing the West”, formerly organized by the University of Colorado at Boulder. Most contributions can be assigned to eco- criticism, an interdisciplinary scholarship of literary and sociological studies that exploits narrative paths scrutinizing the role of the natural environment in the community imagination. The American West extends from Canada to Mexico and from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Coast. Its peculiarity lies in the environment, the biodiversity, the unique inventory of road-less intact ecosystem areas, and – in such a landscape – the high visibility of ecosystem damages. The geographical, biological, and human diversity problems of the West, although complex and intertwined, suffer for their association with the oversimplified mythology of the frontier, which still retains a powerful attraction in American life. On the contrary, Remedies for a New West challenges any mythological narrative, as it aims to be “a call for action and a provocation to thought” (p.13). Analysing the historical development of the West with an eye to the values assigned or denied to the concept of nature in the human-nature relationships, curators claim that the West narrative should be read as grounded in economic reality rather than in the romantic tame of wilderness, surrounded by such conventional issues as profit, loss, and competition. Patricia Nelson Limerick opened the path in 1987, when her book The Legacy of Conquest debunked the consolidated imaginary about migration and settlement beyond the hundredth meridian. Now, the vision of the western conquest as a vast economic event consolidates with suggestions in this volume for intervention in social debates surrounding environmental depletion and preservation of what remains of the original resources. Some contributions are on Native cultures, but arguments range from traditional pueblo dances and urban sprawl to acid mine drainage and nuclear plants, testifying to the great diversity of the West’s human and natural landscapes. Several case studies offer restorative thinking aimed at conserving what has been left, looking also for the possibility to restore what has been lost. As many stories demonstrate, achieving a social consensus on healing strategies is the biggest challenge: problems “can be dealt with technically, but the politics and economics of the issue are quite another story” (p.15). As an example, Joseph Ryan (in his chapter “Cleaning up abandoned hard-rock mines in the Western U.S.”), emphasizes that remediation of contaminated mines can bring whole communities together. Similarly, Brenda Romero (“Matachines, ritual continuity, and cultural well-being”) shows how reviving New Mexican dance rituals can raise novel appreciation of a community’s multicultural heritage. John-Michael Rivera (“Mexicans and the memory of tomorrow’s landscape”), attempts to repair misconceptions between the present and the past recovering the memory of Mexican cultural history, while Len Ackland’s reconstruction (“Open wound from a tough nuclear history”) of controversies on the Rocky Flats nuclear-weapons complex suggests that even decades after its end, the Cold War’s wounds are more easily covered by bulldozed earth rather than being honestly exposed and healed. The theme of people is what ties together the essays most closely, offering not just a scholarly perspective, but personal, human perspectives as well. As the editors explain,“When we begin to recognize that the technical issue at hand is often inseparable from the social processes of addressing that problem it happens that what gets healed is human society, along with or even in place of the more narrowly defined problem at hand” (p. 19). This well-thought collection will be useful for everyone interested in analysing and constructing interdisciplinary bridges between socio-economic studies and other disciplines, such as ecology, journalism, art, civil engineering, or history. The cross-fertilization of perspective that ensues this reading envisages a unified awareness challenging the canon of environmental action as separated from concerns of sociology and anthropology. The West’s natural landscape and its built environment, with their symbolical charge, are at the heart of the issue of balancing development and natural spaces in the U.S. Elaborating a narrative able to include different versions of past histories and different accounts of personal memories would be an

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it