MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580372354

Destination Branding: The Comparative Case Study of Guam and Vietnam

2010· article· en· W1580372354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of international business research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCruise Tourism Development and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismCompetitor analysisDestinationsBusinessRecessionMarketingContext (archaeology)Global recessionEconomicsPolitical scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In the context of a global recession, the tourism industry has struggled hard to battle declines in sales turnover, particularly in countries where inbound tourism is a major economic contributor to national output. To improve their competitiveness, many countries not only promote their natural attractions but differentiate their destinations with branding strategies that establish their unique positions to attract more international visitors and boost sales. This paper is a comparative study of Japanese visitors and their behavior in Guam and Vietnam, both destinations possessing many similarities in climate, culture, and beautiful beaches. Implications for the tourism industry and branding are examined and justified by the high spending potential of the Japanese market segment. Findings from this research can suggest successful paths to a country's branding strategy and tourism development. INTRODUCTION In the context of a global recession, the tourism industry has struggled hard to battle declines in sales turnover, particularly in countries where inbound tourism is a major economic contributor to national output. To improve their competitiveness, many countries not only promote their natural attractions but also differentiate their destinations with branding strategies that establish their unique position to attract more international visitors and to boost sales. The challenge for destination marketers is how to differentiate their offering from competitors in a growing competitive tourism market place. In the tourism literature, many authors suggest that tourism destination branding represents the most obvious means by which destinations can distinguish themselves from the mass of commodity destinations around the world (Folyey, Fahy, 2004, cited by Fyall, Laesk, 2007). However, the need to attract visitors requires conscious branding strategies for the different target visitor groups (Kotler, Gertner, 2002; Freire, 2002). Several countries were very successful in applying the country branding concept, particularly New Zealand (Lodge, 2002), Spain (Gilmore, 2002), France, Scotland (Olins, 2002), and the re-imaging of former Yugoslavia (Hand, 2002), other destinations experienced failures (for instance the case of Ontario analyzed by Lodge, 2002). The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the experience of destination branding on Guam and Vietnam to differentiate their tourism products, both destinations possessing many similarities in climate, culture, and beautiful beaches. The paper will focus on the key inbound market segment for both destinations: the Japanese segment. The chosen segment in this comparative study is justified by its high spending potential and this segment is considered for both destinations their important market to attract. The perception of tourism destination image from Japanese visitors will be analyzed empirically through our exploratory qualitative survey with a small group of Japanese visitors arriving in Vietnam and Guam during the same period of study. Thus, the better understanding about Japanese consumer's behavior, in particular their individual perception about the two destination images explored in this paper will help marketers to identify specific destination image attributes and to design appropriate destination branding strategy for this market. Our paper is structured as follows: The first section presents tourism destination branding research through a brief literature review. The second section analyzes the tourism industry performance and competitiveness of the two destinations of Guam and Vietnam. The third section explores through empirical study the Japanese consumers' behavior and their perception of these two destinations. The last section will discuss the findings and suggest solutions to differentiate the destination brand images in order to improve significantly customer satisfaction. TOURISM DESTINATION BRANDING RESEARCH Tourism destination branding has been viewed as the most powerful tool for destination marketers for differentiation strategies, as places have been becoming more and more substitutable. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it