Temporary flightlessness as a potential cost of reproduction in pre‐laying Common Eiders<i>Somateria mollissima</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid growth and reabsorption of the avian ovary is thought to be adaptive, as it reduces predation risk and the metabolic cost of flight. In this paper, we use an extreme case of parental investment to show how the survival of gravid birds may be impaired by reduced take‐off ability. In still air, temporary flightlessness is regularly observed in female Common EidersSomateria mollissimapreparing for breeding. From a sample of pre‐laying females collected in the Baltic Sea, we quantified the relationships among body reserves, organ mass and take‐off ability using a general model of take‐off performance. Average body mass at the beginning and end of follicular growth was, respectively, 32% and 43% higher than winter body mass. Wing‐loading increased significantly during ovary development whereas the relative mass of flight muscles decreased. In contrast, organ mass and somatic body mass were constant from early follicular growth until laying, indicating that the observed increase in body mass was caused by ovary growth. The average specific lift production of individuals collected at the beginning of follicular growth was 9.7 N/kg, which is similar to the lift required to become airborne (9.8 N/kg). As ovary mass increased, lift production decreased to 9.2 N/kg at the onset of laying. These results indicate that temporary flightlessness results from the accumulation of large body reserves and subsequent ovarian growth. Predators of Common Eiders are diverse and may come from air, water and land. We suggest that temporary flightlessness may decrease adult survival through predation, and may represent an important cost of reproduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".