MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1584268635 · doi:10.1037/e668512011-001

Daily hassles, coping, and acculturation as predictors of psychological well-being among Korean American adolescents

2011· dataset· en· W1584268635 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsycEXTRA Dataset · 2011
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationPsychologyCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyEthnic groupSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine how perceived stress, coping, and acculturation were related to psychological well-being. This study hypothesized that low levels of perceived stress in the form of nonspecific daily hassles and acculturation-specific daily hassles, active or internal coping strategies, and acculturation either western identified or bicultural identified would predict the psychological well-being of Korean-American adolescents. The subjects of this study consisted of 200 Korean-American adolescents (101 males, 99 females) ranging in age from 12 to 19 years of age. Participants were recruited on a voluntary basis from various Korean churches, private schools, and local public middle and secondary schools in Bergen County, New Jersey. Adolescent participants were administered a data survey sheet, The Problem Questionnaire, The Coping Across Situations Questionnaire, The Bicultural Stress Scale, The Vancouver Index of Acculturation, and The Students' Life Satisfaction Scale. Data analysis included Pearson's Correlations and a hierarchical multiple regression. It was hypothesized that coping would be negatively related to the perceived stress of nonspecific daily hassles and acculturation-specific daily hassles. A significant negative relationship was found between nonspecific daily hassles and social support and between acculturation-specific daily hassles and social support. Conversely, three significant positive correlations were found between avoidance, mixed strategies, and withdrawal and perceived nonspecific daily hassles. Likewise, significant positive relationships were found between avoidance and acculturation-specific daily hassles and between mixed strategies and acculturation-specific daily hassles. Data were analyzed to ascertain the contribution of daily hassles, coping dimensions, and acculturation to the psychological well-being of Korean-American adolescents. Regression results indicated that the overall model significantly predicted psychological well-being and accounted for 23% of the variance. Detailed interpretation of results and implications for future research are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it