MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Archaic and the Exotic: Studies in the History of Indian Astronomical Instruments

2015· article· en· W1584925844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAestimatio Sources and Studies in the History of Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrolabeSanskritGlobeAncient historyHistoryIndex (typography)GeographyAstronomyArtLiteraturePhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface Indian Astronomical & Time-Measuring Instruments: A Catalogue in Preparation Astronomical Instruments in Brahmaguptas Brahmasphutasiddhanta Perpetual Motion Machines & their Design in Ancient India Astronomical Instruments in Mughal Miniatures The Bowl that Sinks & Tells Time Announcing Time: The Unique Methodat Hayatnagar, 1676 Measuring Time with Long Syllables: Bhaskara Is Commentary on Aryabhatiya, Kalakriyapada 2 Setting up the Water Clock for Telling the Time of Marriage Sultan Suri & the Astrolabe The Lahore Family of Astrolabists & their Ouvrage The Safiha Zarqaliyya in India Yantraraja: The Astrolabe in Sanskrit Katapayadi Notation on a Sanskrit Astrolabe From al-Kura to Bhagola: On the Dissemination of the Celestial Globe in India Two Mughal Celestial Globes Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.021
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it