MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585231636 · doi:10.1159/000363153

The Role of Thyroid Hormones for Brain Development and Cognitive Function

2014· review· en· W1585231636 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine development · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMental Health Research CanadaHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropsychologyBrain developmentOffspringHormoneThyroidNeuroimagingPhysiologyHuman brainBrain functionCognitionMedicineBrain sizeThyroid functionPregnancyPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyNeuroscienceEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through its actions on regulatory genes that form, grow and sculpt the brain, thyroid hormone (TH) is essential for human brain development. Although much of what we know about these effects is based on research with rodents, recent studies of children exposed to TH insufficiencies during critical stages of early development provide preliminary evidence on how and when the human brain needs TH. This paper reviews some of the major studies from both the rodent research and research on offspring of women with hypothyroidism during pregnancy and children with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) who were assessed using neuropsychological tests and with advanced neuroimaging techniques. The final section will compare findings from children lacking TH due to maternal hypothyroidism and CH conditions, whose loss of TH at different times represents unique time windows for examining TH effects in the human brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it