MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585894568

Representations of hypersurfaces and minimal smoothness of the midsurface in the theory of shells

2008· article· en· W1585894568 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michel C. Delfour

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Cybernetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmoothnessBounded functionMathematicsBoundary (topology)Hessian matrixSobolev spaceSurface (topology)Christoffel symbolsDomain (mathematical analysis)Pure mathematicsOpen setBoundary value problemMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many hypersurfaces ω in R can be viewed as a subset of the boundary Γ of an open subset Ω of R . In such cases, the gradient and Hessian matrix of the associated oriented distance function bΩ to the underlying set Ω completely describe the normal and the N fundamental forms of ω, and a fairly complete intrinsic theory of Sobolev spaces on C-hypersurfaces is available in [8]. In the theory of thin shells, the asymptotic model only depends on the choice of the constitutive law, the midsurface, and the space of solutions that properly handles the loading applied to the shell and the boundary conditions. A central issue is the minimal smoothness of the midsurface to still make sense of asymptotic membrane shell and bending equations without ad hoc mechanical or mathematical assumptions. This is possible for a C-midsurface with or without boundary and without local maps, local bases, and Christoffel symbols via the purely intrinsic methods developed by Delfour and Zolesio starting with [12] in 1992. Anicic, LeDret, and Raoult [2] introduced in 2004 a family of surfaces ω that are the image of a connected bounded open Lipschitzian domain in R by a bi-Lipschitzian mapping with the assumption that the normal field is globally Lipschizian. From this, they construct a tubular neighborhood of thickness 2h around the surface and show that for sufficiently small h the associated tubular neighborhood mapping is bi-Lipschitzian. We prove that such surfaces are Csurfaces with a bounded measurable second fundamental form. We show that the tubular neighborhood can be completely described by the algebraic distance function to ω and that it is generally not a Lipschitzian domain in R by providing the example of a plate around a flat surface ω verifying all their assumptions. Therefore, the G1-join of K-regular patches in the sense of Le Dret [19] generates a new K-regular patch that is a C-surface and the join is C. Finally, we generalize everything to hypersurfaces generated by a bi-Lipschitzian mapping defined on a domain with facets (e.g. for sphere, torus). We also give conditions for the decomposition of a C-hypersurface into C-patches. This research has been supported by National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada discovery grant A–8730. Centre de recherches mathematiques et Departement de mathematiques et de statistique, Universite de Montreal, C. P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montreal (Qc), Canada H3C 3J7, delfour@CRM.UMontreal.CA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueControl and CyberneticsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207