MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588235755 · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0614

Emotional and Personality Development in Adolescence

2003· other· en· W1588235755 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy L. Galambos, Catherine L. Costigan

Bibliographic record

VenueHandbook of Psychology · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalityPsychologyTemperamentPersonality developmentDevelopmental psychologyDistressEmpirical researchSocial psychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter highlights recent theoretical and empirical advances in understanding adolescents' emotional and personality development. Models of emotion regulation are viewed as important in uniting research on emotional well‐being and distress, with emotion dysregulation underlying the presence of interalizing and externalizing problems. Recent research on temperament and personality is also highlighted, which examines the structure, origins, and continuity of personality across the early years in the life span. Four exciting themes in research on emotional and personality development in adolescence are discussed, including a focus on adolescents' optimal development, attention to cultural variations in emotion and personality, the integration of knowledge of emotion and temperament, and the use of a person approach to understanding how constellations of emotional and personality characteristics influence adolescents' developmental trajectories. The chapter concludes by drawing attention to how knowledge about emotion and personality promises to aid in the design of intervention and prevention programs that can lead the way toward promoting healthy youth development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHandbook of PsychologySame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207