MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588744200 · doi:10.1029/gm050p0101

Refinements of the “Baja British Columbia” Plate-Tectonic Model for Northward Translation Along the Margin of Western North America

2011· book-chapter· en· W1588744200 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPaleomagnetismGeologyTerranePlate tectonicsNorth American PlatePacific PlateCretaceousSeismologyPaleontologyTectonicsGeodesySubduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paleomagnetic data suggest that a large part of northern Washington, British Columbia, the Yukon, and southern Alaska (as a whole block named Baja British Columbia or Baja BC) was at the paleolatitude of Mexico at about 90 Ma. Additional paleomagnetic data show that Baja BC was in place relative to cratonic North America by about 55 Ma. We assume that Baja BC was adjacent to North America by middle Cretaceous time, and was driven northward by Kula (and/or Farallon)-North America plate interactions from 90 to 56 Ma. Terrane-travel analysis based on the fixed hot-spot hypothesis shows that the Kula plate could have driven Baja BC the distance inferred from the paleomagnetic data from the Spuzzum and Mount Stuart plutons in the interval from 90 to 68 Ma. A model with a north-south boundary between the Kula and North America plates produces sufficient latitudinal displacement even when the component of movement parallel to the coast is as low as 50%. A north-south plate boundary between the Farallon and North America plates also produces sufficient latitudinal displacement to move Baja BC the inferred distance. The Farallon-North America model, however, only is viable in the extreme case when all of the plate motion was coast-parallel and the entire 90 to 56 Ma time interval is used. In our preferred scenario for translation of Baja BC, the southern end of the block was at the paleolatitude of west central Mexico at 85 Ma, after a few hundred kilometers of translation along the Farallon-North America plate margin. Baja BC then moved along a north-south transform fault(s) between the Kula and North America plates from 85 to 74 Ma, and along an oblique-convergent margin from 74 to 66 Ma. By about 70 Ma the southern part of Baja BC was at the paleolatitude of Oregon, just north of the Klamath Mountains. A triple-junction analysis shows that the Kula-Farallon-North America triple junction would also move rapidly northward in the wake of Baja BC. Most of the possible variations in the type of triple junction place it along northern California by 70 Ma, suggesting that the Kula plate would be offshore of the region from California to southwestern Mexico for part of the 85- to 70-Ma interval, and that the Farallon plate would be adjacent to southwestern North America both preceding and following the interaction of the Kula plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it