Refinements of the “Baja British Columbia” Plate-Tectonic Model for Northward Translation Along the Margin of Western North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paleomagnetic data suggest that a large part of northern Washington, British Columbia, the Yukon, and southern Alaska (as a whole block named Baja British Columbia or Baja BC) was at the paleolatitude of Mexico at about 90 Ma. Additional paleomagnetic data show that Baja BC was in place relative to cratonic North America by about 55 Ma. We assume that Baja BC was adjacent to North America by middle Cretaceous time, and was driven northward by Kula (and/or Farallon)-North America plate interactions from 90 to 56 Ma. Terrane-travel analysis based on the fixed hot-spot hypothesis shows that the Kula plate could have driven Baja BC the distance inferred from the paleomagnetic data from the Spuzzum and Mount Stuart plutons in the interval from 90 to 68 Ma. A model with a north-south boundary between the Kula and North America plates produces sufficient latitudinal displacement even when the component of movement parallel to the coast is as low as 50%. A north-south plate boundary between the Farallon and North America plates also produces sufficient latitudinal displacement to move Baja BC the inferred distance. The Farallon-North America model, however, only is viable in the extreme case when all of the plate motion was coast-parallel and the entire 90 to 56 Ma time interval is used. In our preferred scenario for translation of Baja BC, the southern end of the block was at the paleolatitude of west central Mexico at 85 Ma, after a few hundred kilometers of translation along the Farallon-North America plate margin. Baja BC then moved along a north-south transform fault(s) between the Kula and North America plates from 85 to 74 Ma, and along an oblique-convergent margin from 74 to 66 Ma. By about 70 Ma the southern part of Baja BC was at the paleolatitude of Oregon, just north of the Klamath Mountains. A triple-junction analysis shows that the Kula-Farallon-North America triple junction would also move rapidly northward in the wake of Baja BC. Most of the possible variations in the type of triple junction place it along northern California by 70 Ma, suggesting that the Kula plate would be offshore of the region from California to southwestern Mexico for part of the 85- to 70-Ma interval, and that the Farallon plate would be adjacent to southwestern North America both preceding and following the interaction of the Kula plate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".