MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593785292 · doi:10.1093/oq/kbi044

Victoria Etnier Villamil: From Johnson's Kids to Lemonade Opera: The American Classical Singer Comes of Age

2005· article· en· W1593785292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. Albright

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Opera Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperaThrivingArt historyPerformance artArtHistoryMetropolitan areaVisual artsCartographySociologyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2004 332 pages, $40.00 Victoria Etnier Villamil’s delightful book covers two decades of relatively recent operatic history, from 1935 to about 1955. But the era it chronicles seems as distant today as the age of the pyramids. It’s hard for contemporary opera lovers to imagine a time when opera companies were not thick on the ground, when American singers didn’t dominate their rosters, when cities such as Chicago, Seattle, St. Louis, Houston, Dallas, and Washington, D.C., were not thriving centers of operatic activity. But those days were not that long ago, and this engaging history explains how opera was transformed just before, during, and just after World War II—in other words, the period of Canadian-born Edward Johnson’s leadership of America’s premier company, the Metropolitan Opera. As the author describes her work in the preface, “It is the story of a generation of classically trained American singers who saw their profession, their image, and their art transformed by the extraordinary times in which they lived; it is about the obstacles they overcame, the breakthroughs they made, and the legacy they left” (p. ix).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Opera QuarterlySame topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207