L’écriture de l’histoire au présent. Débuts de l’historiographie du cinéma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès la fin du xix e siècle, on trouve de nombreux textes qui abordent la cinématographie comme un objet ayant une histoire. Ainsi, les photographies animées sont inscrites dans une, voire plusieurs histoires qui, d’une part, les rattachent à des découvertes techniques ou scientifiques du passé et, d’autre part, en esquissent l’évolution à la fois technique et, parfois du moins, formelle. Les auteurs de l’article qui suit cherchent à distinguer quatre dimensions dans ces écrits. Ces dimensions concernent, respectivement, l’établissement d’une généalogie, les querelles de priorité, l’incorporation de l’histoire dans la description de la technologie et, finalement, les débuts d’une histoire des formes. Ajoutons à cela que ces champs d’analyse comportent tous des topoï qui seront repris par la suite par les histoires du cinéma traditionnelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".