MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W159683713 · doi:10.1093/sleep/24.6.721

Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Possible Contributing Factor to Resistant Hypertension

2001· article· en· W159683713 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peretz Lavie, V. Hoffstein

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBody mass indexBlood pressureSleep apneaMorningApneaEveningObstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyAnesthesiaInternal medicineApnea–hypopnea indexCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is evidence supporting an association between sleep apnea and hypertension. However, it is not clear if sleep apnea interteres with the pharmacotherapy of hypertension. To investigate this question, we studied the relationship between the effectiveness of anti-hypertensive treatment in reducing blood pressure, and severity of sleep apnea in a large group of apneic patients referred to a sleep disorders centre at St. Michael's Hospital at the University of Toronto. DESIGN: N/A. SETTING: N/A. PARTICIPANTS: 1,485 adult patients with sleep apnea, as defined by the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) >10 events/hr, were analyzed. There were 393 who reported using anti-hypertensive medications on a regular basis for more than 6 months. One hundred and eighty-three patients were treated "effectively" (i.e. blood pressure lower than 140/90 mm Hg in the morning and in the evening). Seventy-four patients were treated "ineffectively," defined as blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg in the morning or in the evening. Both groups were compared with respect to clinical and demographic data using analysis of covariance with gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and neck circumference (NC) as covariates. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Ineffectively and effectively treated patients were similar in age (57 +/- 9) vs. 57 +/- 10 years, respectively), and had similar body mass index (33.8 +/- 7.4 vs. 33.4 +/- 7.3 kg/m2, respectively). However, ineffectively treated patients had significantly higher apnea/hypopnea index (44 +/- 29 vs. 33 +/- 25 events/hr, p<.0005), despite having similar nocturnal oxygenation (percent of total sleep time spent with oxygen desaturation lower than 90% was 36 +/- 34 vs. 29 +/- 30% in the ineffective and effective groups, respectively). The difference in AHI persisted even after adjusting for age, gender, and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that hypertensive patients with sleep apnea whose blood pressure responds beneficially to treatment have less severe sleep apnea than those patients whose blood pressure remains elevated despite anti-hypertensive therapy. Since neither obesity nor nocturnal hypoxemia appear to be important determinants of ineffective treatment, we suggest that resistant hypertension may be caused by frequent intermittent sympathetic stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207