MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596924111

Semiparametric Efficient Estimation of Partially Linear Quantile Regression Models

2005· article· en· W1596924111 on OpenAlexaff
Yiguo Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of economics and finance · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorInvariant estimatorMinimum-variance unbiased estimatorQuantileEfficient estimatorTrimmed estimatorStein's unbiased risk estimateMathematicsSemiparametric modelConsistent estimatorMinimax estimatorQuantile regressionOutlierTrimmingBias of an estimatorEconometricsStatisticsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lee (2003) develops a n-consistent estimator of the parametric component of a partially linear quantile regression model, which is used to obtain his one-step semiparametric efficient estimator. As a result, how well the efficient estimator performs depends on the quality of the initial n-consistent estimator. In this paper, we aim to improve the small sample performance of the one-step efficient estimator by proposing a new n-consistent initial estimator, which does not require any trimming procedure and is less sensitive to data outliers and the choice of bandwidth than Lee's (2003) initial consistent estimator. Monte Carlo simulation results confirm that the proposed estimator and the one-step efficient estimator derived from it have more desirable empirical features than Lee's estimators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of economics and financeSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207