Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Bestiaire d’amour was written in northern France by Richard de Fournival, Chancellor of Notre Dame “dame,”, in the middle of the thirteenth century. Drawing heavily on bestiary material, it was addressed to an anonymous “dame,” and for her it diverted well-known animal exempla to new purpose: a prescriptive/proscriptive analysis of profane love. Enriching that analysis are Aristotelian reminiscences and digressions. There are also flashes of misogyny, for the new love-bestiary’s didacticism is Ovidian in its complexity. While ostensibly obeying conventional codes of courtliness, it effectively demotes woman from any position of superiority because, in a hierarchy where man’s glory over the other animals is his reason, reason isthe one quality to which his lady is unresponsive. Ending with a plea for mercy from la blle dame sans merci, Richard suggests there will be neither closure nor a happy ending for Le Bestiaire man’s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it