MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597749830 · doi:10.1109/dcc.2002.1000008

Turbo source coding: a noise-robust approach to data compression

2003· article· en· W1597749830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuffman codingShannon–Fano codingTunstall codingVariable-length codeComputer scienceAlgorithmAdditive white Gaussian noiseArithmetic codingContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingTurbo codeData compressionDecoding methodsConcatenated error correction codeEntropy encodingTheoretical computer scienceSpeech recognitionWhite noiseBlock codeTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. All traditional data compression techniques, such as Huffman coding, the Lempel-Ziv algorithm, run-length limited coding, Tunstall coding and arithmetic coding are highly susceptible to residual channel errors and noise. We have previously proposed the use of parallel concatenated codes and iterative decoding for fixed-length to fixed-length source coding, i.e., turbo coding for data compression purposes. The work presented here extends these results and also considers the case when decompression must be done from compressed data corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207