MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600234675 · doi:10.1134/s106192081503005x

Asymptotic unitary equivalence in C*-algebras

2015· article· en· W1600234675 on OpenAlexafffund
Huiming Lin, Z. Niu

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Mathematical Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityEast China Normal UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsUnitalMathematicsHomomorphismUnitary stateCombinatoricsSimplexCommutatorRank (graph theory)Equivalence (formal languages)Simple (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let C = C(X) be the unital C*-algebra of all continuous functions on a finite CW complex X and let A be a unital simple C*-algebra with tracial rank at most one. We show that two unital monomorphisms φ,ψ: C → A are asymptotically unitarily equivalent, i.e., there exists a continuous path of unitaries {u t : t ∈ [0, 1)} ⊂ A such that lim t→1 u* t φ(f)u t = ψ(f) for all f ∈ C(X) if and only if [φ] = [ψ] in KK(C,A), τ ◦φ = τ ◦ψ for all τ ∈ T(A), and φ † = ψ †, where T(A) is the simplex of tracial states of A and φ †, ψ †: U ∞(C)/DU ∞(C) → U ∞(A)/DU ∞(A) are the induced homomorphisms and where U ∞(A) = ∪ =1 ∞ U(M k (A)) and U ∞(C) = ∪ =1 ∞ U(M k (C)) are usual infinite unitary groups, respectively, and DU ∞(A) and DU ∞(C) are the commutator subgroups of U ∞(A) and U ∞(C), respectively. We actually prove a more general result for the case in which C is any general unital AH-algebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207