MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600346329 · doi:10.4000/travailemploi.4019

Les absences au travail des femmes suédoises

2008· article· fr· W1600346329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTravail et emploi · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
FundersOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCommodificationArtEconomicsEconomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les taux d’emploi masquent des réalités sociales très disparates selon les pays, ce qui rend hasardeuse leur comparaison immédiate. Les modes de prise en compte des absences, qui renvoient aux politiques de protection sociale en vigueur, ont une influence majeure sur la mesure de ces taux. La Suède présente à ce titre un taux d’absence au travail très élevé, particulièrement chez les femmes. Second constat : la disponibilité temporelle des femmes en Suède exerce un effet structurant sur la nature et les conditions de leur activité professionnelle, en lien notamment avec les conventions qui président à la construction des temps sociaux. Enfin, le cumul d’une charge domestique qui perdure malgré son partage et d’un environnement professionnel dégradé explique pour une partie des femmes en emploi l’ampleur des absences au travail pour cause de maladie. La décommodification de la vie salariale suédoise est un processus non abouti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it